[Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

[...]

| > So given the constraints does anyone have an alternative plan? What would 
| > it look like?
| 
| I'd like to know exactly where the C++ ABI community people draw their
| lines. "I oppose" is the easier bit, now what is the "but I would
| accept..."

I consider that the C++ part of LSB-2.0 needs more work and I would
remove my opposition if LSB people accept either
   (1) delaying the final vote on LSB-2.0, to allow for more time to
       make progress; or
   (2) postpone the C++ bits to LSB-3.0.

-- Gaby