[Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 29, 2004, at 2:05 PM, anderson@freestandards.org wrote:
>
> The LSB includes by reference the Itanium C++ ABI
> (http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html), which covers the
> compiler behavior. The LSB supplements that specification by adding the
> libstdc++ definitions.
>
> Is there additional compiler behavior that is not covered by these? If
> so, where is it documented?

Yes, the whole point that both 3.4.0 and 3.3.3 do not conform to that
standard all the time.


Andrew Pinski