[RFC/Patch] libstdc++/14320 aka class type streamoff doesn't work :(
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Fri Feb 27 17:57:00 GMT 2004
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>In the meantime, I propose to retain the class you're removing in this
>patch. Removing this class would be the wrong thing to do.
>
>
Wait a minute. Of course I agree with what you are saying about C++ vs long
long. But what about the requirement in 24.1 that difference_type is a
signed
integral type? We cannot even hope to fulfil it and keep streamoff as a
class
type. I believe this is the point of the PR.
Keeping streamoff as a class type, basically amount to closing 14320 as
"WONTFIX"
Do you think we should do this? I would agree with you, by the way...
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list