analysis of libiberty/cp-demangle.c for libsupc++/__cxa_demangle
Ian Lance Taylor
ian@wasabisystems.com
Wed Feb 25 13:57:00 GMT 2004
Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:38:42AM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >
> > Here is a patch for the 3.4 branch. This patch includes fixes to the
> > libiberty demangler, Benjamin's patches to libstdc++-v3 to use the
> > libiberty demangler rather than the libstdc++-v3 demangler, and
> > patches to the libstdc++-v3 testsuite so that it passes.
> >
> > The appended patch does not include the diffs to the generated files,
> > nor does it include the two removed files.
>
> I don't think anybody had proposed actually removing the Wood/C++
> demangler. Did I miss an email?
You didn't look closely at the message at the start of this thread.
Benjamin's patch to libstdc++ removes the C++ demangler. See the
ChangeLog.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-02/msg00326.html
Then Mark proposed that I wrap up Benjamin's patch with a patch to the
libiberty demangler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-02/msg00337.html
That is what I did.
I don't really have an opinion on whether Carlo's demangler should be
removed.
Ian
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list