ext/mt_alloc.h

[Stefan Olsson]

Phil Edwards wrote:

>On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:02:46PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
>  
>
>>In article <20030521183008.2089e4bc.bkoz@redhat.com>,
>>Benjamin Kosnik<bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I'm still in favor of moving extra things out of namespace std in
>>>stl_alloc.h and into ext. Does anybody have strong feelings about this?
>>>      
>>>
>>No.  It does seem that anything not in the standard should be outside
>>namespace std and/or named using our implementor space (i.e. leading
>>underscores, etc).  Also, it does seem that almost everything we
>>advertise to users should not be named in our implementor space.
>>    
>>
>
>Yeah, we should split __gnu_cxx into two.
>
>
>I'm thinking of just mailing the "90% done" patch for the allocator rewrite
>to Stefan, since he's making progress far faster than me.  :-)
>
Hi!

Well, we are busy working on another project right now - but just let us 
know what needs to be done and we'll dig into it a.s.a.p

Brgds

/Stefan

>
>Phil
>
>  
>


-- 
A real person has two reasons for doing anything... 
...a good reason and the real reason.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4634 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20030606/ae60cf12/attachment.bin>