[RFC/Patch] What about using seekoff(-1, ...) for unbuffered underflow?

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Fri Jun 6 14:54:00 GMT 2003


>I'm looking a bit into the new framework for unbuffered input,
>and I'd rather prefer having sbumpc() simple as it was before.

... and seeking after every input? Don't think that's going to fly.
There have been performance bugs about this in the past.

>Also, keeping _M_buf_size in basic_filebuf only.

Eh... 

-benjamin



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list