Names of C++ header include guards

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> writes:

| > What I do not understand is why we removed the _GLIBPCPP prefix (or
| > _CPP_BITS) instead of replacing it just with _GLIBCXX_.  what was the
| > rationale? 
| > 
| > -- Gaby
| 
| Here is a patch to use the _GLIBCXX_ prefix on all the header file
| guards in c_std and std.  I also did a couple of small cleanups in the
| patch to make the endif's in the files more consistent (make all the
| c_std files have no comment on endif, make all the std files have a
| comment).

It is OK.  Thanks,

-- Gaby