Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision

Paolo Carlini pcarlini@unitus.it
Thu Jan 2 20:50:00 GMT 2003

Previous message (by thread): Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision
Next message (by thread): Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>This should be fixed.
>
Indeed, and fixing it seems easy. But *why*?!?

Why, that is, more than digits10 + 1 digits are necessary for min()?

Paolo.

Previous message (by thread): Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision
Next message (by thread): Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list