spurious fails in autocrasher 'gcc' run
Phil Edwards
phil@jaj.com
Mon Oct 14 11:38:00 GMT 2002
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:38:15AM -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hey Phil. I'm not getting these on my test runs:
I was just about to ask about these.
> FAIL: 22_locale/facet.cc execution test
> FAIL: 22_locale/static_members.cc execution test
These concern me, but will have to wait until I get back tonight.
> FAIL: 23_containers/map_operators.cc (test for excess errors)
This can be ignored for -trunk runs. It's due to a configuration error.
It will appear in the unified-tree-with-changes; it's a concept-checking
error.
> What does libstdc++-v3.log have to say about these fails?
"Execution error," nothing else. I will investigate this evening.
> What version of binutils are you using?
>
> %ld --version
> GNU ld version 2.13.90 20021013
The *-trunk and *-3.2 builds use 2.13.90.0.4, so I think it's one of
HJ's releases.
Phil
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list