[RFC] libstdc++/6720 and libstdc++/6671
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@codesourcery.com
Mon May 20 11:13:00 GMT 2002
Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
| On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 02:34:52PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
| > In a nutshell, it looks like the idea of giving the ext/ extension
| > headers the same name of the corresponding standard headers (e.g.,
| > <algorithm> => <ext/algorithm>) was not so good afer all :-(
|
| Ah well, we live and we learn. The only problems I'd noted so far were
| with doxygen; it doesn't seem to do "maximal munch" when parsing header
| file names.
I don't think the naming <ext/xxx> is the problem. We should cure the
problem, not the symptoms :-)
I describe the problem in an earlier message. I just sent a message
on gcc-gnats outlining (briefly) how we should map standard headers
into files.
-- Gaby
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list