Portability of idiom
Benjamin Kosnik
bkoz@redhat.com
Wed Jan 30 11:51:00 GMT 2002
> double __d = strtod(__s, &__sanity);
> if (__sanity != __s && *__sanity == '\0' && errno == 0)
More compelling reasons as to why this bit of code should not depend on
strtod... oh well.
> I have passed this issue along to David O'Brien but in the interest of
> general GCC portability, I wonder if we couldn't revise the error
> checking idiom used to only look for the errno settings documented by
> the standard.
Definitely.
> FYI, this issue is why these tests started failing both
> mainline and 3.0.X branch on FreeBSD 5.0 machines:
>
> FAIL: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc execution test
> FAIL: 27_io/istream_sentry.cc execution test
Cool let's fix this up!
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list