verbose terminate() on by default

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

| The program would have to override the
| __verbose_terminate_handle() function too, which is non-portable and
| unintuitive.

No.  Such a program was already broken.

It is a *fact* that V3 isn't even breaking new ground here.  So a
program that makes the assumption about the implementation of the
default terminate is already broken.

Secondly, I must confess I don't see exactly what you're complaining
about.  Are you talking about a specualative embedeed sytem?  Or about
what? 

-- Gaby