this seems to lost (complex norm, abs)
Theodore Papadopoulo
Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr
Thu Sep 20 11:17:00 GMT 2001
Sorry in my previous mail, I'm speaking of norm where it should be
written abs.... The return type comment is meaningful only for norm, the
computation type comment should still be valid for the abs function.
Theo.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Theodore Papadopoulo
Email: Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr Tel: (33) 04 92 38 76 01
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000
iD4DBQE7qjKhIzTj8qrxOU4RAownAJ4sdL61QmA3lsZqptpJK1lhnLERtQCVFk9O
p3qx7WyYGalySNjxTHoSqQ==
=6tMI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list