> Really, both 3.0.2 and current 3.1 experimental, which include the new libstdc++-v3, > provide a different (correct, IMHO) answer: > > 0000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000000000000000000000000000 Good to hear that. I just spend a lot of time debugging my program during a programming contest, and then I found the bug in STL. Tomek