[v3] Re: libstdc++ license

[Phil Edwards]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:32:38PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> I believe that source base is no longer under active development, thus there 
> will be no future merges. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong. We've 
> already done the concept-check branch and others, so I'm not quite sure 
> how feasible reverse merges are at this point. 

Yeah... Matt's at AT&T, writing a new implementation, I believe.  I haven't
heard of any new work being done on the SGI code.


> Looks like most people favor this move. Pending serious objection, Phil 
> please check this in after 6pm today.

Okay.  (Branch as well, per Mark's request.)  It'll be a bit later tonight.


Phil

-- 
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC