[v3] Re: libstdc++ license

[Benjamin Kosnik]

I agree with Nathan, and would like to see Phil's patch re-applied. Gaby? 
Jason? Phil? Loren?

Sorry I was so confused here Phil.

-benjamin

> The second point is that since the code has already been forked,
> there is no reason not to add the (modified) GPL to them in this 
> case.  Of course, they have already been released under the previous
> license, so it seems the GPL would only apply to 3.1 changes.