[Q]By default standard C++ lib is statically linked?

[Firstworld]

Hi

I doubt my system has shared libc++ lib. Because, under /usr/local/lib, as
for gnu c++ lib-related file, libstdc++.a.2.10.0 only exists.
And g++ -v displays:
"Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)"

Anyway,
I compiled my simple program with g++(without special flag) in release mode.

Its size  is relatively huge and following ldd result doesn't show standard
C++library file:

     libpthread.so.1 =>       /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
        libnsl.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1
        libsocket.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1
        librt.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/librt.so.1
        libm.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libm.so.1
        libc.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libc.so.1
        libdl.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
        libmp.so.2 =>    /usr/lib/libmp.so.2
        libaio.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libaio.so.1
        libthread.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libthread.so.1


Dose this sympton mean the standard C++library  is statically linked?


--
Paul