Doxygen - another sample, preliminary comments

[Phil Edwards]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:52:07PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> > More ideally, if you can do RELEASE-NOTES, I can take those bits from
> > there and put them into the FAQ as appropriate; status.html should
> > also be updated to reflect current reality.  But I don't view those as
> > life-and-death issues or anything.
> 
> I can do this today. Where do I check in the revised file, though? 
> libstdc++-v3/docs/17_intro or some other location?

wwwdocs/htdocs/libstdc++/17_intro would be best.

Hmmmm.  Is libstdc++-v3/docs/* going to be blown away with 2.91?


-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.