gcc-2.95.2 + libstdc++-2.91 == no
Nathan Myers
ncm@nospam.cantrip.org
Tue Dec 5 20:23:00 GMT 2000
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:30:43PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Sorry y'all. Getting the current libstdc++ source base to work with
> gcc-2.95.2 is causing no end of problems. I'm going to stop working on
> getting it to compile, and suggest that the documentation be changed to
> remove references to gcc-2.95.2.
Can we just turn off the features and subsystems that under 2.95.2
don't work entirely right? Whoever needs those features can figure
out how to make them work enough for what they need (and maybe even
send patches), and the rest of us can move on.
There is no way that most shops can use 2.91 if it means switching
to an unreleased compiler, too.
Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip.org
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list