Fixes lost after STL update
Ryszard Kabatek
rysio@rumcajs.chemie.uni-halle.de
Thu Dec 30 07:30:00 GMT 1999
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Nope. It is my intention to track SGI though, and it looks like that patch
> didn't get into this release. I had checked that patch in, and then asked
> you in an offhand, following email if you had a testsuite addition for
> that patch.
>
> Perhaps you could re-submit that patch to v-3 and Matt Austern at SGI
> (austern@sgi.com), and include the test case? That would probably help
> both of us synch up.
>
I sent my patch to SGI some days ago, perhaps to late.
In any case is my patch necessary and correct and the SGI's code
is dangerous as I wrote in my message with the patch.
BTW.
It would be a wrong way to go without own improvements to the SGI's code.
It would discourage people who want help to develop a good implementation
of the standard library.
Ryszard Kabatek
Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Physical Chemistry
Geusaer Str. 88, 06217 Merseburg, Germany
Tel. +49 3461 46 2487 Fax. +49 3461 46 2129
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list