Constant trampoline pages

Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com
Mon Jan 26 10:02:00 GMT 2015


On 23/01/15 17:54, Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> Thoughts?

It looks a lot better than what we have now.  I don't quite get how a
single page of allocated trampolines can suffice, though, even after
reading the code.

The big problem we've had with the dual-mapping trick was how to
survive a fork().  I wonder if your scheme could help with that.

Andrew.



More information about the Libffi-discuss mailing list