[PATCH 0/4] s390 improvements
Ulrich Weigand
uweigand@de.ibm.com
Fri Dec 19 15:07:00 GMT 2014
Richard Henderson wrote:
> This is relative to Dominik's patch from the 16th. The complete
> tree can be found at
>
> git://github.com/rth7680/libffi.git s390
>
> Mostly relevant is patch 3, which converts the s390 port to the
> more modern arrangement where there's no callback into ffi_prep_args.
This is a bit confusing to me. The assembler routine now does:
lg %r15,120(%r2) # Set up outgoing stack
without ever restoring the initial stack pointer before returning
to its caller. This probably works right now since the value loaded
here is determined like that:
/* Pass the outgoing stack frame in the r15 save slot. */
frame->gpr_save[8] = (unsigned long)(stack - sizeof(struct call_frame));
and since "stack" was allocated via alloca and ffi_call_int does not
require an argument save area when calling any of its subroutines,
the stack pointer value computed here should always in fact be
identical to the value %r15 already has at the above location.
Using the 160 bytes below "stack" as register save area for use of the
target function called by ffi_call_SYSV is also only safe if those bytes
are in fact the register save area ffi_call_int provides for its caller,
e.g. again if the value is already identical to %r15. (If this were
any other value, we might clobber parts of ffi_call_int's stack frame
that it conceivably might still access.)
However, if the procedure only works if the "lg" is a nop, why is it
even done? Also, the whole setup seems a bit fragile since changes
to ffi_call_int might cause it to need an argument save area ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
More information about the Libffi-discuss
mailing list