[COMMITTED 2.34 0/2] Improve aligned_alloc and calloc test coverage

[Miguel Martín]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Tue, 2024-05-21 at 12:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Miguel Martin via Libc-stable:
> 
> > From: Miguel Martín <mmartinv@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Backports to improve aligned_alloc and calloc test coverage in
> > glibc 2.34:
> > 
> > DJ Delorie (1):
> >   aligned_alloc: conform to C17
> > 
> > Joe Simmons-Talbott (1):
> >   malloc: Improve aligned_alloc and calloc test coverage.
> 
> As far as I can see, none of these patches have actually been
> committed
> (pushed to the official repository).
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian
> 

Both are in master and the first one has been already backported to
release/2.39/master:

git branch --contains d1417176a35d27ffb8da0ffb1e33154163b6eeb2
  master
  release/2.39/master

git show -s d1417176a35d27ffb8da0ffb1e33154163b6eeb2
commit d1417176a35d27ffb8da0ffb1e33154163b6eeb2
Author: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 21 00:46:43 2023 -0400

    aligned_alloc: conform to C17
    
    This patch adds the strict checking for power-of-two alignments
    in aligned_alloc(), and updates the manual accordingly.
    
    Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>

git branch --contains 3395157ff2b0657d70c36169156f67440205c8bf
  master

git show -s 3395157ff2b0657d70c36169156f67440205c8bf
commit 3395157ff2b0657d70c36169156f67440205c8bf
Author: Joe Simmons-Talbott <josimmon@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue May 14 14:36:50 2024 +0000

    malloc: Improve aligned_alloc and calloc test coverage.
    
    Add a DSO (malloc/tst-aligned_alloc-lib.so) that can be used during
    testing to interpose malloc with a call that randomly uses either
    aligned_alloc, __libc_malloc, or __libc_calloc in the place of    
malloc.
    Use LD_PRELOAD with the DSO to mirror malloc/tst-malloc.c testing 
as an
    example in malloc/tst-malloc-random.c.  Add malloc/tst-aligned-   
alloc-random.c
    as another example that does a number of malloc calls with randomly
sized,
    but limited to 0xffff, requests.
    
    The intention is to be able to utilize existing malloc testing to 
ensure
    that similar allocation APIs are also exposed to the same rigors.
    
    Reviewed-by: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=DXW+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----