[PATCH] arm: fix PIC vs SHARED typos

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> > But if they were
> > supported, the PIC code here looks better than the non-PIC - you can't
> > just put an absolute address in a constant pool in the text section in
> > position-independent code the way the non-PIC code does; the conditional
> > really does seem to be about "must the text be position-independent?".
> 
> so it sounds there are two issues.  there is PIC code behind "#ifdef PIC" 
> which is good, but the code also decides which symbol name (which is a SHARED 
> define) via PIC ?  that's the part that i'm trying to fix.
> -mike

In that case you'll need to send a patch that handles PIC properly for 
both SHARED and non-SHARED cases, with reference to the corresponding libc 
conditionals as explanation of the basis for the differences between the 
two.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com