[Bug localedata/20664] Unexpected collation in en_US.UTF-8, different to ICU CLDR
Keld Simonsen
keld@keldix.com
Tue Dec 20 16:00:00 GMT 2016
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:10:56PM +0000, carlos at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20664
>
> Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
> Last reconfirmed| |2016-10-03
> CC| |carlos at redhat dot com
> Ever confirmed|0 |1
>
> --- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
> Going forward we want glibc to track CLDR more closely. Therefore if you can
> find a glibc version that exhibits meaningful difference between CLDR, then
> please file a report, like this one.
>
> However, you have too many moving pieces for us to validate this, for example
> sort is not a good test case because it might itself not use glibc's collation
> tables for sorting.
>
> Can you construct a test case with strcoll that exhibits this problem?
I do not think we should aim at following CLDR closely, but we should minimize
differences. I actually think we should get CLDR to follow us more closely:-)
Bestregards
keld
More information about the Libc-locales
mailing list