[Bug localedata/10501] bn_IN collation does not have canonical equivalence definitions

[santhosh dot thottingal at gmail dot com]

------- Additional Comments From santhosh dot thottingal at gmail dot com  2009-08-17 11:40 -------
Refer the collation rules of UCA -
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCA/latest/allkeys.txt
[...]
09CB  ; [.1B48.0020.0002.09CB] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN O
09C7 09BE ; [.1B48.0020.0002.09CB] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN O
09CC  ; [.1B49.0020.0002.09CC] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN AU
09C7 09D7 ; [.1B49.0020.0002.09CC] # BENGALI VOWEL SIGN AU
[...]

It is implemented in UCA and should be available in glibc localedata too. ie,
Collation weights of canonically equivalent sequences should be explicitly
defined in glibc and there should not be any assumption on the input to the
collation.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10501

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.