is this a bug in glibc or readpst?

[Paul Wise]

On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 10:59 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:

> We could perhaps avoid the seek for read-only streams.  We are about to
> close the stream anyway, so fflush does not have any useful effect
> anyway.  Not sure what others think if it is worth the complexity.  On
> the other hand, preserving backwards compatibility here does not appear
> to be too onerous.

It might be worth checking what other implementations do, perhaps
if they all avoid the seek in this case then maybe glibc should too?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-help/attachments/20230807/a8b90b3e/attachment.sig>