Errors cross-compiling gdbserver with glibc-2.34
Chris Packham
Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Mon Aug 9 09:29:33 GMT 2021
Hi,
I'm looking at updating crosstool-ng to add glibc-2.34. I can generate a
toolchain fine but when I try to build gdbserver (which can be enabled
as part of the crosstool-ng build) I get some odd gnulib build errors.
https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng/pull/1570#issuecomment-893784531
I can disable building gdbserver as part of crosstool-ng and
successfully generate a toolchain. But when I use that toolchain to
manually build gdbserver I get the same error (included below as it has
a bit more useful output than on the link above).
CXX amd64-linux-siginfo.o
In file included from
/home/ctng/x-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/bits/sigstksz.h:24,
from
/home/ctng/x-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/signal.h:328,
from build-gnulib-gdbserver/import/signal.h:52,
from
../../../gdb-9.2/gdb/gdbserver/../nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:20:
build-gnulib-gdbserver/import/unistd.h:135:3: error: #error "Please
include config.h first."
135 | #error "Please include config.h first."
| ^~~~~
In file included from
/home/ctng/x-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/bits/sigstksz.h:24,
from
/home/ctng/x-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/signal.h:328,
from build-gnulib-gdbserver/import/signal.h:52,
from
../../../gdb-9.2/gdb/gdbserver/../nat/amd64-linux-siginfo.c:20:
build-gnulib-gdbserver/import/unistd.h:137:1: error:
'_GL_INLINE_HEADER_BEGIN' does not name a type
137 | _GL_INLINE_HEADER_BEGIN
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
build-gnulib-gdbserver/import/unistd.h:1929:1: error:
'_GL_INLINE_HEADER_END' does not name a type
1929 | _GL_INLINE_HEADER_END
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make: *** [Makefile:635: amd64-linux-siginfo.o] Error 1
Everything works fine with the same configuration under glibc-2.33.
Any clues as to what might be going on? I'm kind of thinking there must
be some difference in include paths between glibc-2.33 and glibc-2.34.
Thanks,
Chris
More information about the Libc-help
mailing list