glibc-2.9 CVE-2015-7547 fix

Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com
Mon Mar 14 19:17:00 GMT 2016


On 03/11/2016 10:15 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 10:15 -0800, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 05:46 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote:
>>
>>> Someone who understands what is going on in this part of the library
>>
>>> please comment to give me some insight, particularly if this change may
>>
>>> be a bad idea for other reasons.
>>
>>
>> Are you actually dealing with an unpatched glibc 2.9?
> 
> I patched it with backports of a number of Red Hat patches from glibc
> 2.12 (that is used in el6 and centos6).  I had to cherry pick from some
> 200+ patches (it wasn't easy).

Yes, we also had to backport additional patches to our 6.2 and 6.4
branches to get cleaner test suite runs.

> It was pretty close to pristine 2.9.  That version was released from CVS
> rather than GIT.  Do you know how good the CVS history conversion into
> GIT was?

It's not super-accurate in terms of commit matching, but the changes are
all there.

Do you need IPv6 support?  If not, you could just replace AF_UNSPEC with
AF_INET.

Florian



More information about the Libc-help mailing list