Regex
vijay nag
vijunag@gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 14:44:00 GMT 2014
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Игорь Пашев <pashev.igor@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014/1/9 vijay nag <vijunag@gmail.com>:
>> Ok. And the real question here is, why "*" cannot be used to match any
>> string in extended regular expression whereas it works fine in basic
>> regular expressions ?
>
> Could you provide a minimal test program?
>
> It looks like a bug.
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/regcomp.html :
>
> REG_BADRPT
> '?', '*', or '+' not preceded by valid regular expression.
cat regex.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <regex.h>
int main()
{
regex_t regex;
int val;
val = regcomp(®ex, "*", REG_EXTENDED);
printf("retVal = %d\n", val);
if (0 != val) {
printf("Bad usage of ^, + or *\n");
}
val = regcomp(®ex, "*", REG_BASIC);
printf("retVal = %d\n", val);
if (0 != val) {
printf("Bad usage of ^, + or *\n");
}
}
Vijays-MacBook-Pro:/Users/vinag]$ gcc -g -O0 regex.c
Vijays-MacBook-Pro:/Users/vinag]$ ./a.out
retVal = 13 ------------->REG_BDRPT
Bad usage of ^, + or *
retVal = 0
More information about the Libc-help
mailing list