Question on Glibc add-ons

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 26 November 2013 10:18:29 Simon wrote:
> I have another question regarding glibc here: In my glibc build
> directory, there is a ld.so as well. It appears to me that the new
> libc.so can only be interpreted by this ld.so. Is it true?

yes, what you describe is to be expected

see this doc for more details:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Testing/Builds
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-help/attachments/20131127/f047e1f4/attachment.sig>