why the DSO was loaded at address 0
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue May 21 14:39:00 GMT 2013
On 05/21/2013 04:24 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Abin Xu <abin1525@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But the file "error" shows that "/lib/libc.so.6" was loaded to address 0!
>
> No, it does not.
>
>> 14690: file=/lib/libc.so.6 [0]; needed by ./test [0]
>> 14690: file=/lib/libc.so.6 [0]; generating link map
>> 14690: dynamic: 0x0043cd7c base: 0x00000000 size: 0x00191988
>> 14690: entry: 0x002c5e40 phdr: 0x002af034 phnum: 10
>
> Presumably you are mis-interpreting base:0x00000000 is the load
> address. It is not.
>
> What it is is the relocation (difference) between linked-at address
> and loaded-at address.
>
> Usually, shared libraries are linked at address 0, and when they are,
> the relocation is indeed the same as loaded-at address. But your
> libc.so.6 has been prelinked to address 0x002af000, and was loaded at
> that address, giving you 0 relocation.
By the way, do you know the correct way to obtain an address from
dladdr() which can be passed to addr2line? So far, I haven't managed to
do this when prelinking is involved.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
More information about the Libc-help
mailing list