strtoul(-1) discussion
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Mon Apr 15 07:45:00 GMT 2013
On 04/07/2013 06:24 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> I would be more than happy to review a patch to enhance the manual
> to discuss the porting issue and that glibc's strtoul doesn't conform
> with the standards.
Is this really true? I was under the impression that for historic
reasons, the standards require that both strtoul and the %u conversion
specifier accept negative values.
What do other systems do?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
More information about the Libc-help
mailing list