How is [re]located?

Siddhesh Poyarekar
Sun Mar 27 09:53:00 GMT 2011

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Nix <> wrote:
> ... yep, here we are: <>.  I never
> tried it, so I don't know how well it still works, but presumably it
> worked at one time. (Of course it too has a different name for
> so this might not help too terribly much if the problem is
> indeed an existing binary that needs running.)

There's patchelf, which ought to do the trick here. It modifies the
binary itself to use a different loader:

Siddhesh Poyarekar

More information about the Libc-help mailing list