suspicious uses of RETURN in obsolete <regexp.h>

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Sun Mar 1 08:01:00 GMT 2009

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <> writes:

> So the RETURN (11); statement and similar ones earlier in the
> function don't seem conforming to me.  I suspect they should all
> be changed to ERROR.

More information about the Libc-help mailing list