[OT] Re: Non-responsive list (was: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64/linux semctl())

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Nanno Langstraat <nlcom_os@ii.nl> wrote:
>  But o.t.o.h. leaving people hanging without any response at all is not
>  great for growing a larger developer / maintainer / janitor pool.

For the record I'm going to respond here. I'm CC'ing libc-help which
is our more cuddly list.

If your email didn't get a response, ping, ping again, present pro/con
arguments for the addition of these macros. You need to argue why they
should be included into glibc and not somewhere else like the kernel.

Cheers,
Carlos.