rand() man-page ambiguous or bug in glibc?
Sun Jul 20 15:24:00 GMT 2008
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:29 PM, "Michael Kerrisk" <email@example.com> wrote:
> I already responded to the earlier version of this report, and
> described to you the fix for the man page (the evidence of your
> program is correct; the man page was badly worded). I'm not sure why
> you are sending this message again?!
If you do not mind, would you please resend the described fix to this mailing list?
It will certainly help me and others who would like to make the man pages better.
Thank you very much.
More information about the Libc-help