bits/in.h patch

Andreas Jaeger aj@suse.de
Mon Feb 19 08:15:00 GMT 2007


Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> These redefine some values.  Should I add these as well?  That would
>> close bugzilla #3906 as well.
>
> How do you know the values Hurd is using?  The value for all these
> macros is system-specific.

Shouldn't we make then the file completely system dependend and move
it to sysdeps?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
   Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-hacker/attachments/20070219/32b34f24/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list