[PATCH] ppc ulps fixes

[Steve Munroe]

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>  wrote on 01/30/2006 10:41:09 AM:

> Hi!
> 
> I think it is better to merge ulps results rather than regenerate, that 
way
> we don't suddenly start getting many errors when using slightly older
> compilers.
> Also, I think it is a bad idea to put
> ldouble: 17987982955981951215498976719132
> and similar into the libm-test-ulps file, only the ulps we want to 
tolerate
> (< 10, < 12 or something like that).
> 

I have a patch coming that fixes the underlying problems and the ppc ulps 
file. I'll send it as soon we complete the internal review.


Steven J. Munroe
Linux on Power Toolchain Architect
IBM Corporation, Linux Technology Center