deadlock in signal handler with NPTL
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk@suse.de
Wed Jun 23 04:26:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, Jun 22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:50:59PM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got the following test program. I know, it is very ugly and there
> > are a lot of things somebody should not do, but this is something
> > what programs like sshd are doing.
>
> Then they should be fixed. Neither syslog, nor printf, nor fflush
> are supposed to be async-signal safe, nor they actually are in glibc.
Yes, but the problem is: Nearly every daemon on a Linux system is
calling syslog() in a signal handler and it seems to be very easy
to deadlock them on every Linux system running glibc/NPTL. While
there seems to be no other system with the same problem.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG Maxfeldstr. 5 D-90409 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list