[PATCH] Add FTW_ACTIONRETVAL flag to nftw{,64}

[Ulrich Drepper]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> POSIX doesn't explicitely list EINVAL, do I have to silently
> ignore it instead?

It is perfectly alright to add new error values.  Especially since a
non-standard feature (the new falg) has to be used to trigger it.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/q+wV2ijCOnn/RHQRAtoWAKC6YX20Ralupx/Ov7ORWoso/3XjOgCfQahL
+cg5Afwed4tmqgdoCJCQQK4=
=G2Wx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----