more cancellation work
David Mosberger
davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com
Tue Jul 15 22:29:00 GMT 2003
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:27:36 -0700, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said:
Uli> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Uli> David Mosberger wrote:
>> - gdb never had any problems with libunwind itself (it was
>> initially released under GPL, now it's even under the MIT license
>> so that the *BSD folks can use it for their kernel)
Uli> That's not enough. The code has to be assigned to the FSF.
libunwind is not part of gdb, so I don't see why it would need an
assignment.
Uli> But all this is pointless. If anything should change it's
Uli> ia64. There was no reason to invent something new but still it
Uli> was done. For no good reason.
That sounds like a lot of sour grapes. I don't know the history
behind the ABI work, but changing it now sure seems like a bit
late... ;-)
In any case, are you worried at all about dynamically generated code?
If so, how are you planning to handle that?
--david
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list