Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Mon Jan 27 22:08:00 GMT 2003
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
|> On Monday 27 January 2003 22:38, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
|> > |> Though note that this _requires_ binutils 2.13.90.0.4+ or 2.13.1+,
|> > |> otherwise there will be really strange interactions with gcc.
|> >
|> > In which way?
|>
|> Earlier binutils doesn't correctly link together 2 shared libs (libgcc.so and
|> libc.so in this case) which have the same version of a symbol, but aren't
|> both linktime references. The PPC solution was only possible after hjl fixed
|> a few binutils bugs. The fixes went into 2.13.90.4 and 2.13.1. IIRC the best
|> case was binutils refusing to link glibc with some strange error message,
|> but I think it was also possible to get a corrupted libc.so.
I don't think this is an issue since glibc is using -static-libgcc.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list