separately compiling libc modules for rtld
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Tue Oct 1 00:31:00 GMT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roland McGrath wrote:
> But it is some untested new subtlety, so if 2.3 is very imminent
> I don't know if this should wait for 2.3.1.
I'd rather prefer to wait for 2.3.1. This looks like a patch which can
have many hidden possibilites to break something.
I know that Hurd has problems. But exported symbols temporarily should
be able to fix that, right? And it also doesn't introduce any permanent
ABI damage. So I'd rather go this way unless you prefer to not change
the code and declare 2.3.1 as the first release usable for Hurd.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE9mU9q2ijCOnn/RHQRAupgAJ9BdeHtvdC3mCPI6Xcp49cEkrVMdACfSo23
g4xVDujA+Qv09trt2QdAaEc=
=46PA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list