Versioning problem with __register_frame
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Wed Jan 30 04:45:00 GMT 2002
"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:
|> Does this mean that we have to make them GLIBC_2.0 versioned symbols
|> although the earliest symbol set for s390x is GLIBC_2.2 ?
This will be automatically handled. Even many Versions files list symbols
under the GLIBC_2.0 version the shared library will not contain versions
prior to the earliest version as specified in shlib-versions. See the
generated file Versions.all in the build directory to see how it works.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list