Versioning problem with __register_frame

Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Wed Jan 30 04:45:00 GMT 2002


"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:

|> Does this mean that we have to make them GLIBC_2.0 versioned symbols
|> although the earliest symbol set for s390x is GLIBC_2.2 ?

This will be automatically handled.  Even many Versions files list symbols
under the GLIBC_2.0 version the shared library will not contain versions
prior to the earliest version as specified in shlib-versions.  See the
generated file Versions.all in the build directory to see how it works.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list