New warnings: INT redefined
Andreas Jaeger
aj@suse.de
Tue Feb 5 05:04:00 GMT 2002
Using INT in libc-symbols was not the best idea, we now get a lot of
warnings since INT was used previously:
../sysdeps/generic/strtol.c:62:1: warning: "INT" redefined
../include/libc-symbols.h:355:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
../sysdeps/generic/strtol.c:64:1: warning: "INT" redefined
../include/libc-symbols.h:355:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
tst-printf.c:77:1: warning: "INT" redefined
../include/libc-symbols.h:358:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
How should we solve this issue? I would suggest to use INTNAME
instead of INT in libc-symbols.h.
What do you think? Shall I send a patch?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list