[PATCH] Nuke another 21 .plt slots
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Mon Aug 5 23:43:00 GMT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If -O3 could inline only static or explicit inline routines, it would
> be far less useful than it currently is (for the applications which benefit
> from automatic inlining, of course, the majority does not).
The problem is not loss of optimization. The semantics f code gets
changed. And incorrectly so. gcc cannot inline a non-static function
unless its visibility != default. It might be possible to add a gcc
option to signal that all functions can be assumed to be non-preemptible.
- --
- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE9T28s2ijCOnn/RHQRAvVsAJ0T3Y7mxqpqNxVndZWjPCZ+hkrSXQCeP9AK
18XrDpDvZ8qqVTAew4Y1cSs=
=7nCZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list