[PATCH] Fix IA-64 build

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:07:33PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I think the better solution is for those platforms not to have both modules
> at all, or have one empty.  Why have two idential syscall entry points
> generated?  I think you would get the right result by having an empty
> lseek.[cS] in sysdeps/.../ia64 to override the unix/syscalls.list definition.
> It might be handy to let syscalls.list indicate an empty module with a line
> instead of adding the files. i.e.:
> 
> llseek	EXTRA	lseek	      3 __libc_lseek64 __lseek llseek __lseek64 lseek64 lseek
> lseek	llseek	-
> 
> so if llseek.o is built according to the first line, then lseek.o will be
> made a dummy object by the second line.

If it listed __libc_lseek, __llseek among aliases, it would work, yes.

	Jakub