x86-64 patch 1/2

[Andreas Jaeger]

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > 
>> Here's the first patch to integrate the x86-64 port into glibc.
>> 
>> Ok to commit?
>> 
>> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ mips.*-.*-linux.*	ld=ld.so.1		GLIBC_2.0 
>>  hppa.*-.*-.*		ld=ld.so.1		GLIBC_2.2
>>  s390x-.*-linux.*	ld=ld64.so.1		GLIBC_2.2
>>  cris-.*-linux.*		ld=ld.so.1		GLIBC_2.2
>> +x86_64-.*-linux.*	ld=ld64.so.1		GLIBC_2.2.4
>>  # We use the ELF ABI standard name for the default.
>>  .*-.*-.*		ld=ld.so.1
>
> In the light of current FHS-discuss talks, shouldn't this be
> /lib64/ld-linux.so.2 (ie. ld=ld-linux.so.2 and related changes)?


The ABI states /lib/ld64.so.1 and I agree, we should change it to
/lib64/ld64.so.1.  But why should it be ld-linux.so.2?  We could do
this change but I'm not convinced.

I forgot the appended patch.  Is anything else missing?

Andreas


2001-09-18  Andreas Jaeger  <aj@suse.de>

        * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in: Add minimal kernel version
        for x86-64, install x86-64 into */lib64.

--- configure.in        2001/07/09 11:51:42     1.42
+++ configure.in        2001/09/18 17:38:10
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ case "$machine" in
   sh*)
     arch_minimum_kernel=2.3.99
     ;;
+  x86_64*)
+    arch_minimum_kernel=2.4.0
+    ;;
   *)
     arch_minimum_kernel=2.0.10
     ;;
@@ -102,7 +105,7 @@ fi
 # in /lib and /etc.
 if test "$prefix" = "/usr" -o "$prefix" = "/usr/"; then
   # 64bit libraries on sparc go to /lib64 and not /lib
-  if test "$machine" = "sparc/sparc64"; then
+  if test "$machine" = "sparc/sparc64" -o "$machine" = "x86_64"; then
     libc_cv_slibdir="/lib64"
     if test "$libdir" = '${exec_prefix}/lib'; then
       libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib64';

-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj