getaddrinfo security problem ?
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk@suse.de
Tue May 22 06:40:00 GMT 2001
On Fri, May 18, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> I don't know if it is correct to return AF_UNIX with a path in
> /tmp. I think this is a very bad idea, and for me it looks like
> glibc should not do this. I cannot find any other implementation
> where AF_UNIX is returned, looks like only glibc is doing this.
>
> Any other opiniums ? What does the standard say about this ?
> I think we should disable it.
If I look at the various source codes:
We can remove PF_LOCAL and gaih_local, or we don't allow PF_LOCAL
if PF_UNSPEC is set. I would vote for the first option, removing
it completly like BSD has done this.
Any other ideas ?
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE GmbH Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list